SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Who's Guiltier?-- Andrea Yates or her Husband? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (53)2/27/2002 7:23:26 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74
 
I would bet that
there are a lot more children that have died at the hands of
their fathers while the mothers have known that the children
were at risk. Why didn't you take up this particular cause when
it was the mothers who should be held responsible for the
father's crimes?
***************************************************************

I strongly agree & always have that both parents are equally responsible for the protection of
the children. Assuming the mother knows the danger the child is in, she should be held legally
responsible as well.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (53)2/28/2002 9:20:12 PM
From: SmoothSail  Respond to of 74
 
From that article:

>>Voices in her head would tell her to "Get a knife!" and harm members of her family.<<

If someone walked up to you and told you to "Get a knife and harm members of your family" - which ones would you choose? Assuming, of course, that you're going to do everything everyone tells you to.