SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shack who wrote (10864)2/28/2002 5:27:15 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
As with many indicators and soothsayers, they are quire effective as long as the paradigm remains the same. They break down as soon as the paradigm changes. Thus, buy-the-dips types seemed like magicians in 2000 and idiots in 2001. I think that the Rydex numbers are also facing a paradigm shift as investors diversify and hedge as a long-term strategy instead of greedily chasing the Naz.



To: Shack who wrote (10864)3/4/2002 10:35:07 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
SI: StockTalk: Coffee Shop : Clown Free Zone-E-Wave Workspace
Replies: 33116
View Next 10 Messages | Previous | Next

To:davidd who wrote (33086)
And yes I am short.<<<<

OH, WELL - sh*t happens -g-

From: Shack Monday, Mar 4, 2002 9:09 PM
Respond to of 33116

No sh*t eh? Bears getting mocked across SI. The strange thing is that the bulls claim there is a proliferation of bearish sentiment which will ensure the rally continues. As an objective reader, I don't see it. Sure there are still bears around but there aren't many that I can find and bulls are way more vocal right now.


Well shack-o since you chicken sh*ts on the clown fark zones banned me from posting because your so fearful of somebody that disagrees with you, (i had it out with JT about his mega bullishness during the slide in feb 01, but he never banned me, you pussy clown farks just can't stand detractors can you)

i wanted to respond to this post.

why the FARK can't the bulls be right now????

you should go back and read the post i linked to this message and THINKABOUTIT -G-

and i'm still waiting for you to take that obnoxiousclown-fark label off your thread header, your thread could be so much better than a lucretious clone thread.



To: Shack who wrote (10864)3/12/2002 12:07:12 AM
From: bobby beara  Respond to of 19219
 
To:Gamma Positive who wrote (10859)
From: Shack Thursday, Feb 28, 2002 4:38 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 11179

GP, agree with your analysis. In a trending market the 'extreme' Rydex asset values are a moving target. We are obviously breaking new ground in what is considered extreme numbers as we work our way towards a bear market bottom. <<<

well despite your arrogant "clown free" label - which means you think your in the KNOW -lmazzoff-, you were making this post well after the dow bottomed and as it was above psycho 10k and turning up and after the naz had bottomed on feb 22.

and while people were loading up with puts and bear funds.

you don't get this kind of feedback from you clown fark zones because you all reinforce your behaviors and clear out all dissenting opinion.

i notice you don't post much in non=clown free zones =lol=

let me know when you go long, so i can sell and get short -lol-

ohh yaa , all you clown fark ewavers were calling rydexers smart money when they were loadin bear funds, now that they are startin to load bull funds are they still smart muny?

lmazzoff-



To: Shack who wrote (10864)3/12/2002 12:51:46 AM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
did i just ask for you to be a contrary indicator to go long, then i'll get short.

whadday mistake to ask somebody who has been so wrong on the markets for six months to give me such a good pivot.

-g-