SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (232709)3/1/2002 4:01:19 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!

That the best you can come back with????

Bill destroyed your phony underlying premises with the facts....

Wipe that egg off your face....



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (232709)3/1/2002 4:06:33 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769670
 
My response was the opposite of a non sequitur. Point by point, I refuted every allegation you made.

It's a major scandal because management tried to pay off politicians for favors that enhanced their business. Sometimes those payoffs worked (like when Clinton granted SEC waivers for them and guaranteed some of their debt) and sometimes they didn't (like when Bush refused to provide illegal help with their debt rating).

But Enron is not about how big business screws the worker. Quite the opposite, as they match 401 contributions 100% and compensated their employees very well.

One last point. I said it depends on how you define "pal". Personally, I really don't know how close they were. Doesn't appear that they were buddies though.



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (232709)3/1/2002 7:45:54 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
One last point: Your contention that GWB and Lay were not "pals" is absurd. The evidence to the contrary is overwhelming

You've called me and several others here, "pal." Where does that put us?