Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (1303)	3/5/2002 3:09:42 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"Wanna try again? Your choice." Try again at what? How about continue? "You questioned how and why one might strive and struggle for righteousness outside a religious construct." I don't remember doing this. Could you refresh my memory please, as this seems to be the disconnect.

To: Lane3 who wrote (1303)	3/5/2002 3:30:20 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Looking back...here is what I found. Me: "To seek righteousness for righteousness sake. But why? That was my question." I think that we had agreed that people seek righteousness for righteousness sake simply because it is there. I added the question, Why? You brought the Mount Everest thing into it and reported that dreaming of conquering Everest was evidence of a soul. I was joking when I responded that this must mean I have no soul. You patiently clarified that it was not the only evidence but simply one manifestation. I challenged you on how this applied to the question at hand. At which you became offended by the appearance of mistrust; your mistake. I merely think you’ve failed to hit the targeted question. I see this as a side track. You appear to see it as conclusive. It might help if you would explain what you believe a soul to be, but I doubt if that would answer the question