SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (73580)3/5/2002 9:12:23 PM
From: wanna_bmwRespond to of 275872
 
Petz, Re: "So I think it is safe to say that Clawhammer will have a 1M L2. That leaves room for a much larger core+L1, going from about 20M transistors to 34.4M transistors.

Possible the L1 is also enlarged?"


How about more Hypertransport links?

wbmw



To: Petz who wrote (73580)3/5/2002 9:17:28 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Petz,

I doubt that Clawhammer will have 100M chips. How do you go from .18u chips with ~120mm^2 die size which has 37.5M transistors to .13u chip that is 104mm^2 and has 100M transistors?

I recall Hans mentioned that AMD is using very inefficient SRAM cell, which has a lot of room for improvement, but this kind of improvement is just not credible.

Joe



To: Petz who wrote (73580)3/5/2002 10:25:58 PM
From: kapkan4uRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
<So I think it is safe to say that Clawhammer will have a 1M L2.>

I think JS was talking about Sledgehammer with 1MB L2 having 100M transistors.

Kap