SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (7318)3/6/2002 9:44:15 AM
From: arno  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
I believe you'd like the book.

The book was not written to glorify war but to demonmstrate the courage and character of the American soldier.....a review

amazon.com

I plan on seeing the movie soon.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (7318)3/7/2002 3:20:47 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
You know arno...I just saw the movie "We Were Soldiers" and a small part of the fabric of the story is to depict the cluelessness of politicians and even the generals....

Shortly after the Ia Drang battle, General Westmoreland commented that if we only lost one soldier for every 10 the North Vietnamese lost, we'd eventually win the war, because we'd wear them down.

The funny thing about that remark, and what showed Westmoreland to have been totally clueless was that General Vo Nguyen Giap made a similar comment more than 10 years before Westmoreland in the context of the war the Vietminh were waging against the French. The difference was, however, that Giap commented that the French could kill 10 North Vietnamese for every French soldier killed and the Vietminh would still win the war.

The difference was that the North Vietnamese were fighting for something they believed in. The French, and later the United States, weren't.