Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (18644)	3/7/2002 4:00:50 PM
From: Quincy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34857

Wireless data-only providers don't have a history of surviving unless they can be paired with voice services.

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (18644)	3/7/2002 4:56:09 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

"partial response" have always been a funny thing, as has the inabilty to understand peak-average amplitude statistics. Funny because they are so deeply, fundmentally embedded in the constant amplitude, 100% distorted, nonlinear, gaussian GSM, while it still is band limited. That is why the Q-filters they didn't have, those 129 matlab-taps, were so hilarious. Ilmarinen Pointing to the peak-average dilemma of OFDMA and to the general direction of "partial reponce" is pretty smart, both kind of magic, but the first obvious and the other kind of double-magic. I have actually been waiting for a "partial response" QCDMA variation, the problem is partially and probably that some easier spinning word must be invented, something like "orthogonal, superior response"?? Btw, OFDMA is being deployed according to time schedules in european terrestrial digital TV systems, but one should not talk about it, Murdoch might get upset.