SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (1796)3/8/2002 2:55:40 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
So what would you expect Kendall to say? He's Clinton's mouthpece, ferchrisakes.

Sounds pretty independent to me. I'm sure he wouldn't be remotely influenced in investigating a Democrat President... just because he's standing against a Democrat Senator... LOL.
Overruled. Speculative.

no pleading the 5th ........ now since an alleged crime may have been committed
Do you Brits still not get it? It was the felonious misconduct of your own monarchs that lead to this:

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

It is especially because "an alleged crime may have been committed" that they may plead the 5th. Otherwise, what good is it?

Oh. and there's another problem: alleged. Here in the USA there is a presumption of innocence by the law until proven guilty.

You guys might want to adopt these ideas.