SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/11/2002 9:01:52 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Re: "...it's only recently that the neo-conservatives of today have sold out their principles to big business special interest groups."

The problem with that is that it is the IMPOSITION of "protective" tariffs, which big businesses will strive to have our politicians sell-out to get. And, the fact that tariffs harm overall business in all countries involved.

Dan B



To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/11/2002 9:21:43 PM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
if people don't want to give my arguments much weight, perhaps they will be motivated to read up on how great presidents and founders such as washington, madison, adams, jefferson, hamilton, clay, lincoln, teddy roosevelt, coolidge, etc and all of the republicans from the civil war up until world war two were all protectionists or in favor of tariffs. reagan preached free trade but didn't have a problem slapping quotas on steel, motorcycles, electronics, and other things when he deemed it necessary.

The classic "appeal to authority" argumentative non-argument (regardless of the accuracy/inaccuracy of your appeal).



To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/11/2002 10:47:39 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
it's a shame, and for that republicans have lost my vote.

You determine how to cast your entire democratic franchise based on one tariff?



To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/12/2002 12:29:28 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The framers of the Constitution intentionally left limited forms of taxation available to the federal government. It was to keep a week federal government. It worked for almost two hunded years.

Message 17184787

With little alternative forms of revenue, is it any wonder why your luminarious list supported tariffs?



To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/12/2002 12:31:11 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 769670
 
The framers of the Constitution intentionally left limited forms of taxation available to the federal government. It was to keep a weak federal government. It worked for almost two hundred years.

Message 17184787

With little alternative forms of revenue, is it any wonder why your luminarious list supported tariffs?



To: craig crawford who wrote (236453)3/12/2002 12:38:21 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 769670
 
oops