Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (162050)	3/13/2002 3:47:40 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten re: Speaking of which, where are the DDR notebooks for Athlon 4? The "QuantiSpeed" marketing guys sure would appreciate it. I think it was pretty clear in Ali's post that QS is a measure of cpu performance rather than system. DDR with athlon 4 would be nice from system performance stand point but how is it relevant to QS? Also it might be that amd resources ( that are very limited as we all know) are tied to hammer development since the family of mobile athlons is to have very limited remaining life-span. Mobile Athlons are to be replaced by mobile hammers in 1 year as per the following roadmap: amd.com Regards -Albert

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (162050)	3/13/2002 4:54:33 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

"Because it's AMD who needs to prove that "QuantiSpeed sells." Intel doesn't need to prove that "GHz sells."" This was a good one. However, in case it was not posted yet, the "MADregister" reports: "Intel adopts PR rating/ part number shock?" theregus.com "So what then is the difference between the 2GHz P4 and the 2.0AGHz P4?" "But since when did a letter indicate speed? This looks like a part number to us, just like the PR ratings deployed by AMD with the Athlon XP." Enjoy. - Ali