Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (83285)	3/14/2002 3:58:44 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 117072

Since when did Neville Chamberlain qualify as a despot I regard Neville Chamberlain and the "Peace Movement" politicians of Britain and the USA as OK guys. They did there job as they saw it. The voting public did not want another war after the experience of WW1 and they did their bit as best they could. It's a bit like the USA civil war "defeat" at Monocacy armyhistoryfnd.org Lewis "Lew" Wallace was utterly defeated, yet Grant later said from such a defeat a major battle was won. It was the invasion of Poland and the Pearl Harbor attack that changed things. Then peaceful people knew that they had to change and fight a war once again.... terrible though that would be. War is such a terrible thing. It was good that all avenues of peace were explored. Then once that was shown to be hopeless, then the hard business of war is begun.