SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3044)3/15/2002 7:55:46 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
True, true...still it would be inspiring to see someone of quality rise from the "of the people" commoner ranks. Doesn't seem to likely in this generation.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3044)3/15/2002 7:57:52 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Yes, on the large scale we are not doing that badly. On the immediate scale, it has been a bit jarring, possibly because both options in the recent election were sons of politicians, and both were so conspicuously devoid of any merit beyond membership in the political caste.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3044)3/15/2002 9:53:36 PM
From: thames_sider  Respond to of 21057
 
. In this country, their influence doesn't seem to be all that lasting. Compare them to British aristocracy, for example.
When you've had time for more generations of inbred advantage, then be satisfied... the only things I'd feel pleased about comparing to British aristocracy are the competitors at Cruft's.
I know how a nice powerful family looks so admirable, but there is no divine right to rule.
Right now, I can recall only two nations on the planet where an 'elected' head of state actually owes his position to birth - where, were it not for the father's position, it is unfeasible that the son would be in any notable role, still less the prime office of his country.
So stand up, George W Bush and Kim Jong Il. The US and N Korea...