SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oral Roberts who wrote (24814)3/16/2002 10:26:56 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 59480
 
She was tried in the county with the highest number of death sentences in Texas. I'm thinking that if she was black, brown, red, or yellow, she would fry; but, she's white.

WharfRat



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (24814)3/17/2002 1:02:24 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 59480
 
The defense really screwed up in jury selection. There were, if I remember correctly, EIGHT women on the jury. Now the defense may have believed the women would be more sympathetic, but it achieved the exact OPPOSITE effect.

Most women aren't going to be sympathetic in such a case because "I would never think of harming my child." Every parent at one point or another has been stressed and frustrated to the point where that thought comes into their heads - "I could wring the little bastard's neck." But that thought is not allowed in our culture, we all have to be Donna Reeds and Ward Cleavers who are never more than mildly and momentarily displeased with their offspring. Your average American woman isn't going to admit to those thoughts and isn't going to be sympathetic to a woman who ACTED on them. I'm not saying they *should* be sympathetic (I'll head off that flame war now), just that I can see where the defense may have thought they would be.

Derek