Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (239210)	3/17/2002 10:55:07 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Which facts? Here is what you said: "Not only that, but Kevin and his vacant liberal friends forget that many law enforcement officers are members of the NRA and strong proponents of the Second Amendment. They also forget that NONE of these proposed gun laws will keep guns out of the hands of criminals. NONE! It's so obvious, it's been a bumper sticker for years: "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." or was it: "I did consider the "Whole Amendment." The phrase "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state" does not modify the second part, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It's an unnecessary phrase, but if you insist, then you are in the militia like the rest of us." Both have been repudiated. In the second post, it shows that the 2nd amendment clearly does not guarantee the right to bear arms. If you disagree, take it up with the Supreme Court. The first was in response to your admiration of the NRA and its "efforts" to help law enforcement. Some help. Blocking legislation for waiting periods, blocking the need for computerized record keeping to track guns used by criminals, impeding the ATF from timely inspections of gun dealers. By help, if you mean helping the criminal, then they have achieved their goal.