SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (3699)3/20/2002 3:41:59 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
That was a rather sarcastic response to a well intentioned post. You seem to have a pretty good grasp of the demographics of persons found guilty of heinous crimes. Any one who has even fringe knowledge of the justice system knows that persons convicted and sentenced for felonies typically have a long record of criminal violations. I can't believe that you need to see documentation on the statistics to be convinced of that.

If you disaggree with my position let's explore that but this last comment appears like an attempt to lead me on a bird walk.

A death that is quick and painless resolves all issues for the heinous criminal. It is the most controlling thing one human being can do to another. Emotionally stable people like to think of themselves as kind, giving, and care taking individuals. Assigning the death penalty ends all such considerations. Once in the justice system it is our responsibility to determine the course that a criminal's life will take. Is there a compassionate path to take with the heinous criminal? The cruelest treatment one human being can hand to another is to deliberately cause suffering or to torture another. Life in prison is an unending regime of both. It is a very unpleasant decision we must make on behalf of our society and for the protection of innocent loved ones.

My position on this is simply that our current method of dealing with heinous criminals is very sad and irresolute for all who are involved. As someone who has had a lot to say about keeping heinous criminals alive, explain to me what you see as the purpose of their lives after conviction? Or, how justice is to be met in such cases? Unless you see the pursuit of justice as a pointless exercise.



To: Solon who wrote (3699)3/21/2002 10:01:12 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
I haven't seen this point in the replies, but I'd agree with Jewel that most of these people [on death row] are probably not in prison for first time offenses because it seems empirically unlikely that a first-time offender would be a typical murderer, and particularly that the murder would be such that it it merited the death penalty...

Although the race bias mentioned in an earlier post makes me less confident than I'd wish in saying that. :(