Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DiViT who wrote (66216)	3/20/2002 4:18:10 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Violating the hearsay rule is a pretty basic lawyer screw up. This new attorney the states hired doesn't look too hot. Of course, Jackson in the lower court made no such ruling of inadmissible hearsay on the thousands of emails he considered.

To: DiViT who wrote (66216)	3/20/2002 4:52:06 PM
From: jonkai	Respond to of 74651

Judge throws out allegations of Microsoft wrongdoing ya, and then she left in actual examples of MSFT wrongdoing.... hense the strong arming DELL tactics were left in.... and the rest of the testimony by RealNetworks was left in... including real examples of MSFT's wrongdoing.... jon.

To: DiViT who wrote (66216)	3/20/2002 4:59:54 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74651

More hearsay and speculation. I've yet to see evidence of actual wrong doing. << She said the states have not called those individuals, like Schuler, to confirm what Microsoft said. "I don't see how this can be anything but hearsay," Kollar-Kotelly said. >> The state's didn't call Schuler? They decided to have someone else try to put words in his mouth? No wonder the judge tossed out the testimony. KK seems fair. I suspect that whatever remedy modifications come out of these hearings will be a fair compromise. If there are any modifications at all. IMO, Dave