SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (3918)3/21/2002 10:15:48 AM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
We are not automatons.

When we define certain crimes in the law as "heinous," we are collectively as a society expressing our outrage at those particular offenses. We are collectively expressing our "feelings." IMO, such value judgments are eminently fitting to a society of humans.

One of the strongest arguments for the death penalty is that it is the only punishment that is fitting for a person who has taken another's life. Any lesser punishment devalues the worth of a human life.

It annoys me greatly that those who rail against the death penalty rarely even know who the victim was, let alone feel any outrage over the theft of that person's life.



To: epicure who wrote (3918)3/21/2002 11:47:15 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
The felony murder rule can have some pretty strange results.

I believe there was one case where the someone was tried for felony murder after his accomplice was killed by the police in a shoot-out.

Tim