Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sean sanders who wrote (32799)	3/21/2002 10:29:36 PM
From: Chris	Respond to of 52237

very true...

To: sean sanders who wrote (32799)	3/21/2002 10:34:15 PM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

I would probably give weight to either argument; <<< yes, that's why it's the dangling man -g- we have been correcting sideways for a couple of weeks this could be something of a bear trap below support. i got busy with some other work today and still positioned defensively with an spx short, so i'm hoping it was a hanging man, i was expecting the market to let me out of this short more gracefully -g-

To: sean sanders who wrote (32799)	3/21/2002 10:44:53 PM
From: KymarFye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

"hammers/shooting stars/ and sometimes even hanging man often signify something" well, yeah... that's why they put 'em in the book... or parchments... or whatever they used... all the same, sometimes they don't mean much of anything... and sometimes they mean the most when they're dramatically negated... but, as I already pontificated in my prior post, I don't see much value in trying to make something out of something that just looks a bit like a good patern, in a market that's being awful stingy lately both to bulls and bears...