Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (4264)	3/22/2002 4:36:07 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Yes, it is related to neediness. Er? Unfortunately, this seems, especially in the last paragraph, to be a major step backwards. It makes me very sad, and rather weary. Maybe I will say more later.......

To: Lane3 who wrote (4264)	3/22/2002 6:03:39 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

I reserve the right to discuss things other people perceive as sacred. I'm prepared to do so in a constructive way, without 'tude, but I recognize nothing as sacred. In return, I expect the religious to recognize that what they consider sacred is their POV only and to lose the sacred chips on their shoulders. An excellent way of putting it, Karen. Very good. I agree completely. I wonder..... Does Neo refrain from beef because Hindus consider the animal "sacred"?