Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (162892)	3/25/2002 6:00:37 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

"That's why it's titled "300mm Performance Matching". Under my assumption, if the graph were set to a different scale with the origin at zero, the advantage would look at lot less impressive. And frankly, this makes much more sense than your assumption." Which advantage? You said yourself: "performance MATCHING". If the goal was to demonstrate MATCHING, and they outline the matching as being within "5% range", why would they stress the mismatch by amplifying the chart? And again, which "advantage"? That the 300mm fab yields parts that are lower by 100MHz? Can we have a little consistency here in your squirming? "For a 1.5V processor, that would mean that at least 90-120W of power will be dissipated from the processor - even if all the transistors are "off". " I guess you spell it by yourself, congratulations! Maybe now the water-cooling of P4 demos will make more sense to you? "Let me give you a piece of advice." I guess you need to take your advice back :-) As always... - Ali