Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (75779)	3/28/2002 1:58:16 AM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 275872

<font color=red>Time to give your Feedback to Aberdeen's report on AMD's XP ratings http://http://www.aberdeen.com/feedback or aberdeen.com aberdeen.com Report aberdeen.com pdf version of report amdmb.com AMDMB.com's take amdmb.com To further escalate the problems I have with the article, is that I was contacted by AMD today and informed that AMD was never contacted in regards to this report on their own products. AMD had no input in the report, no chance to give the answers to Aberdeen similar to the ones that even I (or any educated PC enthusiast) could give to them. AMDMB forum amdmb.com Mike Magee's tidbit Intel funded anti-AMD paper theinquirer.net Give your feedback today. M.

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (75779)	3/28/2002 5:41:32 AM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

W If true: With mobile p4m as low as that one would expect desktop prices to be even lower. It is going to drag down xeons as well. So Intel's breadwinner is going to be Itanium? :-)) Regards -Albert

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (75779)	3/28/2002 7:56:54 AM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 275872

Re: Sounds like Intel will defend mobile share at any cost at least until Banais. Maybe this is why Intel hasn't been able to "lower the boom" on desktop prices - they no longer have a profitable segment in which to hide while bombing ASPs in segments in which they face competition. It takes a lot of the heat off AMD. Intel is also sounding more and more desperate to hide the actual performance of their systems from buyers. Abergate being the best example. If Elmer were right about Intel being able to easily ship P4s approaching 3GHZ, why would they have needed to fund Abergate?