SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. P. who wrote (11378)3/28/2002 9:58:14 AM
From: macavity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
Explanation.


By comparing Implied Volatility VIX with actual volatility - Historic Vol - you are making a guess as to whether an option is cheap or expensive relative to how the price has been moving, and therefore how the price may move.

16% vol corresponds to 1%/Trading day.
Thus if VIX is at 20% and the market is moving less than 1% a day/ or less than 2 1/4 % per week then implied vols are expensive and may result in option traders selling vol rather than buying it despite VIX being at a low
Turning pts in low vol tend to occur when
i) VIX is at the low of the range
ii) Implied Vol is cheap.

To look at VIX without looking at how volatile the actual markets are is only getting half the picture IMO.

-macavity



To: J. P. who wrote (11378)3/28/2002 10:03:47 AM
From: Dexter Lives On  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
However even by historical standards the VIX is awfully low.

Message 17056812

Average VIX since beginning of 1986 (to end of Feb 02) is 21%. I'm not sure we are not reverting to lower volatility, lower return era - "return to the mean". See Warren Buffet's comments re: investor expectations and likely prospective returns...

Cheers. Rob