Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (75810)	3/28/2002 2:55:18 PM
From: stribe30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Albert said: thank you, it is interesting about bringing up something irrelevant to prove a point. Aberdeen did not forget to mention AA at a key point so you know that amd can not be trusted. Well a) it wasnt AMD who posted this report -- it was AMDZone.com.. and b) I'm not sure the news clipping is irrelevant in proving a point.. I think whoever sent this to AMDZone was trying to show evidence that Aberdeen has been pro-Intel in the past, so their attack on AMD and the PR-rating isnt supposed to be surprising.. the surprising part is about Intel's apparently funding the report as reported by Mike and the Inquirer. I guess one could ask or suspect whether Aberdeen had funding last yr on the "Itanium 42% marketshare by 2005 report".. but without evidence.. thats speculation and hearsay.. doesnt make Aberdeen or Intel look that good however. I agree with Mike - Amd may have got handed a small PR (pun intended) victory.