Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (83904)	3/29/2002 7:18:37 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116912

<<Quixote windmill tilting assholian antics. >> No,(damn-it) fighting evil may be seen as tilting at windmills because the evil so massive as to be beyond the point it can be beaten, it doesn't mean the evil shouldn't be fought. As I often wrote Rarebird, truth must be the goal, even if when won the truth gained is only a relative greater degree of truth instead of absolute truth. The quest for truth should not be seen as antics or (on the other side)a profit opportunity.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (83904)	3/29/2002 11:03:31 AM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116912

We've taken a lot of grief for being right about Bill's frivolous, Quixote windmill tilting assholian antics. If you were indeed that certain, why didn't you cocksure folks smugly sit back and ignore all the GATA hoopla around you. That you didn't only shows you were all not only an exceptional bunch of masochists but that you all had some niggling doubts about your stand. Of course, it is always only too easy to exult after the verdict of a judge who really had based his judgement on two "technicalities". All too often, what is "legal" is not necessarily ethical. The last remark in my last post was just meant to be ironic

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (83904)	3/31/2002 11:38:13 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116912

Message #83908 from gold_tutor at Mar 29, 2002 6:07 AM ... be realized that the GATA suit was quite unnecessary to begin with... seer points for those of us who KNEW immunity was the law of the land and had the FORESIGHT as well as the balls to realize IN ADVANCE the ridiculousness and unnecessary irritant of the GATA nuts trial balloon lawsuit. We've taken a lot of grief for being right about Bill's frivolous, Quixote windmill tilting assholian antics. Now with his head on Shakta's Lance Point and being paraded around the parade grounds in its dripping bloody gory glory, the headless HOWErseman has been dispatched in record time with minimal cost to the taxpayers. Hrrmph![End.] (or) "... what the judge is telling them." a.k.a. Reg Howe... has teed it up for any of them." (or) Subj: James Turk - Howe vs. BIS Date: 3/31/02 From: LePatron@LeMetropoleCafe.com To: dougak@akak.com Le Metropole Members, James Turk has served commentary from The Freemarket Gold & Money Report at The Matisse Table entitled, "Howe vs. BIS." "So Reg loses in court, but he still wins. Reg wins because this ruling appears so contrived in so many respects, even the most casual observer who chooses to read it will readily understand that this ruling says little about justice, but everything about power. In the end, this ruling says that the Defendants Greenspan, Summers and McDonough are above the law. Even the Stuart kings of Britain yearned for such unbridled power. But this privilege of sovereign immunity does not extend to the other Defendants, which brings up another reason Reg wins." OUTSTANDING summary of Judge Lindsay's recent ruling on Reg Howe's lawsuit. While we lost this battle in court, it is CLEAR that the GATA/Reg Howe camp is winning the war. The Gold Cartel is in big trouble. Is there one gold company out there that can run with the ball from here? Reg Howe, with his extraordinary effort, has teed it up for any of them. That is what the judge is telling them. All the best, Bill Murphy Le Patron, LeMetropoleCafe.com