SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (5564)3/29/2002 8:23:39 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
I somehow figured you flarpnik.

What about the thread header change suggestion? I think the specificity isn't achieving anything that can't be achieved without it, at this point, and that it is unnecessary. Basically I see no justification for it now. I'm not proposing that anyone currently banned be unbanned, no reason having arisen for changing that arrangement. I'm only suggesting that the thread header disturbs me at this point.



To: Lane3 who wrote (5564)3/29/2002 8:34:42 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
HOLD IT! You're Miss Let's-have-a-nice-thread-where-no-one's-feelings-get-hurt. Nice? How do you do that with Land? He's a walking riot.

Or do only certain incendiarists get the benefit of that?

Explain yourself.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News