Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (5859)	3/30/2002 2:27:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21057

Our Queen Mother passed away this morning - #reply-17264651 .... earlier i had in mind a smart-ass post to Solon in which i would opine that it was time for us to get tough with atheists as clearly they are not adhering to the One True Right Only Way of agnosticism, going around as they are pretending to know what they cannot possibly know, being as fully religious as any other whacko out there .... but it all seems so trite now, and for sure somebody has posted the same thought in the same words somewhere previously, so to evade accusations of plagiarism i'll pass until the next blessing of the three-beer buzz PMs - i don't like em in general ... feels sneaky or something ... plus there is an implied urgency in need for response, i hate that E and X - i've enjoyed many a post from both of you ... sure wish you wouldn't squabble ... well, unless you enjoy that, hey it's a big world Solon - i haven't forgotten your excellent post on the tariff thing - #reply-17263058 ... it just wasn't a good friday thing maybe, later i'll record it for posterity over on FOs vs Cuddlies, got comments on several points too, off now for brunch with neighbours .... cheers, all [edit] - E, i thought the 'is nothing sacred' joke was actually pretty funny, it left me thinking as well, which is more than can be said for most jokes .... but i can't find it in a hurry, way too many hits for 'sacred' on this thread, lol ... cháu

To: E who wrote (5859)	3/30/2002 2:53:40 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I think it is too easy to say you have such pm's when you do not especially when ideas about what is threatening clearly differ perhaps you have a pm and consider it threatening when the other person had a totally different interpretation of the communication that is, imo, what the TOU are for, and why we have SI Jeff after you make the claim you have exposed the other person, who could be innocent, to the vise of "Agree to expose your private communications, or be considered guilty" I don't happen to think that is a very good situation, do you? If you do think that is a good situation then I do not agree with you. It is not an aspersion on you that I do not agree with you.