Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cordob who wrote (163287)	3/31/2002 12:46:32 PM
From: Monica Detwiler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

cordob - You wrote I am not anti Intel, on the contrary have made lost* of money on that stock* A Freudian slip ? Monica

To: cordob who wrote (163287)	4/1/2002 9:16:40 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

cordob, In an earlier phase they were asking for $ 3 Billion in damages, but I believe they have dropped that in favour of the injunction. I wonder how long Intel can survive now w/o making P4s and Itaniums? What are the chances that INGR will succeed? I know nothing about the case, but if there was a realistic chance for Intergraph to prevail, there would be a lot more press about it. As far as surviving without selling P4 and Itanium, Intel is doing fine without any Itanium revenues. Erasing the Itanium related expenses would actually increase Intel's profitability, so there may be people secretly hoping that the courts will help Intel out of it's Itanium misery. On the P4 side, there is no chance IMO that the injunction is going to be the outcome. Intel would have negotiated a settlement by now, if Intel's lawyers thought that a loss was a possibility. Joe