SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (6047)3/31/2002 2:54:36 PM
From: Poet  Respond to of 21057
 
Looks like we agree, Marsh.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (6047)3/31/2002 3:11:16 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
I would almost agree, but I think acting "as if" something is true does make it more real. The very fact that people build edifices to worship God(s) makes the Gods more real.

I talk a lot of mumbo-jumbo to my friend about "surfing the wave" and "going with the flow" and "karmic payback". He isn't convinced that there is anything more going on than just normal cause and effect. My counter is that by acting as though it my 'theory' is true, namely that "what you pay out, you receive" or "what you sow, you reap", these principles come to be first order approximations of generally correct behavior.

In SGBR, I talked about the objective reality of Santa Claus. How would a "real Santa" versus "parental Santa simulation" produce different effects? The fact that Santa is a simulated person really isn't that important. The real message is that even when you don't know anyone is watching, Santa knows. It is a good mnemonic or memory aid for the basic principle: "You never know all the causes of a situation or the consequences." So, in a practical way, the objective versus absolute existence of Santa (in the hands of the user, a five year old), is not easily distinguishable.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (6047)3/31/2002 4:47:33 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 21057
 
*There is mystery and "awe" in science as much as in religion, btw
Good point, Mars. Some of what is now understood at the smallest scales and the largest and in between is simply mind bogling. The intricacy and complexity of life and the fact that such a system actually WORKS is breathtaking. The deeper one gets into it, the more amazing it is.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (6047)3/31/2002 5:46:51 PM
From: steve wong  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Is there a religion that searches for scientific knowledge?
What do you view as the necessity of religion?

Steve