Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (6412)	4/2/2002 6:57:39 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

One thing that puzzles me is how they raised the money to make this movie. Perhaps it was touted as something both compelling and enigmatic, so much so that people would be talking about it forever. I'm not much of a movie buff, but it sure got to me. I don't recall ever before wanting to see a movie more than once.

To: E who wrote (6412)	4/3/2002 10:35:07 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

He assumes that Teddy's account is true. I see no way of trusting it. That is the main difference. Anyway, you are welcome, although I am not sure that a revisit is the way to go. Maybe you can watch a dog chase its tail instead. As for the funding, it is a "high concept" independent. Indies have been on a roll since the mid- 80s, at least, and high concept movies have the advantage of being easily described. Whether people consider how it will film is another matter.......