Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (6606)	4/3/2002 4:37:30 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

You're making some powerful arguments, Tim - #reply-17280015 ... i'm inclined to lean your way in it at this point, separation of church and state should be inviolable imho, it is not however threatened by freedom of expression of the individual .... necessarily ... could be in some circumstances, quite easily .... again, as in so many things, the freedom of one is limited by the freedom of the other, judgments must be made as to where lines are drawn People should just lighten up, whatever they believe ... that being said, i claim my right to chant the radical agnostic mantra anywhere, guvmint propitty or no ¡doh! i dunno ¡doh! i dunno ¡doh! i dunno and neither do you, m'sieu

To: TimF who wrote (6606)	4/3/2002 5:16:20 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

are those religions? I thought we were talking about religion I was talking about religion Maybe you've gone on to another topic If so I've no idea what it is- except that religious ideas and secular ideas are different, which the framers seemed to understand. Our Constitution makes a special distinction about religious ideas, which I think is warranted. There isn't any clause about the government not establishing environmental policies for everyone, that I am aware of, anyway.