Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggamer who wrote (21258)	4/8/2002 4:03:50 PM
From: JGoren	Respond to of 197253

except for the fact you don't always get 144 on wireless, i can guarantee you don't ever get 56k on aol. most i ever get is about 48k and usually 43.3 or when lots of traffic less.

To: ggamer who wrote (21258)	4/8/2002 11:07:51 PM
From: techlvr	Respond to of 197253

All good, but probably some stickler would cry false advertising. Still, overall you are on the right track. Something that is catchy, points out the current speed averages or possibilities, and invites easy comparisons to other existing known quantities.

To: ggamer who wrote (21258)	4/9/2002 12:33:04 AM
From: puzzlecraft	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197253

When PCS rolls out 1X will they be offering ISP services to replace AOL?

To: ggamer who wrote (21258)	4/9/2002 12:07:59 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197253

OT?? .. I should have studied marketing! Maybe we all should. Do you want to revise your marketing campaign when, the peak data rates go to 153 kbps, to 307 kbps, to 2.4 Mbps, and even higher? Do you want to revise your marketing campaign when, the technology goes from CDMA2000 1x to 3x (if it ever does), or when it goes from CDMA2000 to CDMA2010 (made that up)? Probably not. That is the beauty and wisdom of the 'intel inside' campaign (yeh, really lower case). More powerful processors, higher speeds, but still 'intel inside'. But saying 'Qualcomm inside' would be an obvious copycat tactic .. and Intel might take offense and sue. Sorry, I have no other suggestion. jmho, Ron