SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Death of Silicon Investor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Venditâ„¢ who wrote (574)4/9/2002 10:26:04 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1003
 
Interesting article... I had seen similar stuff from other news agencies on the AOL story. Makes one wonder about the whole concept, at least from the standpoint of an investor.

Chat sites were born out of the old bulletin board communities, before the widespread use of the Internet began. Under the BB "rules", the site owner sponsored the board (in essence), and some of the bigger, better boards charged a small monthly fee to reduce costs, particularly telephone line costs and hardware improvements. The board owners themselves were generally uncompensated, and ran the boards as a labor of love rather than with the intent of prospering from them. Costs were minimal, as was participation. Due to insufficient ports (each point of entry into the BB required a separate telephone line, hence additional costs), users of the BBs often encountered seemingly interminable waits in a sometimes fruitless effort to logon to the BB. This was especially frustrating to gamers, who sometimes had to get up in the middle of the night to determine their game status. (I know. I used to play a game called Trade Wars on more than a few of these BBs.)

On another note, InfoSpace was mentioned today on Cramer's new show on CNBC. The mention was not flattering at all. Cramer was reading from an e-mail attributed to Henry Blodget from several years ago. The context of that portion of the show had to do with the recent Merrill Lynch court case. Mr. Blodget referred to InfoSpace as a PoS stock (or words very similar in meaning to that phrase). This was during a point in time where ML still had a recommendation out on InfoSpace. Taken out of context, Mr. Blodget's remark could be construed as meaning he didn't really like InfoSpace, yet allowed the recommendation to stand, possibly because of an investment banking relationship between Merrill and InfoSpace. (So much for Chinese walls, if that speculation is correct.)

KJC

PS - I'm not presenting the InfoSpace story as being factual. I'm merely relating the tale as it was told on CNBC this evening, or as best as I can remember it.



To: Venditâ„¢ who wrote (574)4/9/2002 11:13:09 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen  Respond to of 1003
 
Confirming why I don't bank on advertising. Advertising won't support an online company these days, IMO. I expect the climate to improve quite a bit, but not terribly soon and still not enough to be relied on for the majority or even a large percentage of a company's income.

To me, advertising is just a nuisance factor to encourage people to subscribe. Little else.