SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nommedeguerre who wrote (67200)4/12/2002 4:12:38 PM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
<< Did you then find yourself losing the appeal via unanimous decision by the Court of Appeals? >>

Sure, why not. I was first found guilty of reckless driving and DUI as well as speeding. The Appeals Court reversed the lower courts decision on all but the speeding ticket. They unanimously ruled that I was guilty of speeding. They spent 18 pages of their ruling chewing out the lower court judge for his bias and ruled that he could no longer be involved with my trial since he expanded the case to include the DUI/reckless charges despite no evidence on either charge.

Having found that I only violated a speed limit I decided to settle with the DA for a fine of $50.



To: nommedeguerre who wrote (67200)4/12/2002 4:17:14 PM
From: _scar_face_  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
<<Either learn to work with the System and get rich, or senselessly fight it and have it bite you in the ass every step of the way.>>

And if/when the existing proposed settlement is approved, which will MORE then adequately restore competition, you'll have to "get rich" the old fashioned way; compete.

Get over it.