SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Death of Silicon Investor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Digrdug who wrote (583)4/14/2002 9:20:33 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1003
 
To:(Bob) Zumbrunnen [worked for SI]... From: Digrdug

Digrdug,

Two sides to every coin and battles between people,
and where the coin's sides reflect in truth, the truth,
as given by the people on each side, may not be truth
or the whole truth or anything except an agenda to lie.

So Digrdug, with the realization that (Bob) Zumbrunnen hopefully
will read this reply to the post you submitted to him, i feel that
another side's view is needed not to represent the side that is
currently on the MYNG thread since i un-BookMarked that thread
as a direct result of your constant un-ending same old same never
ending exchanges of non-information about the company itself,
and now i read your post to (Bob) Zumbrunnen as if you been wronged.

Dear Digrdug,

Let me do a short simple comment(s) on what you say.

Sunday, Apr 14, 2002
Bob: I am having a huge hassle with SI jeff over the MYNG thread...
I believe that GE is a complete scam but of course I have no proof...[end.]

Good Golly unGoodness times a zillion Digrdug,
your NOW words of
"GE is a complete scam but of course I have no proof...[end.]
no proof
you have no proof
no proof NOW
BUT Digrdug, WHERE THE *****ING **** IS THAT PROOF
YOU HAD, I REPEAT, YOUR HAD ALL THOSE MONTHS
YOU TOLD ALL WHO READ THAT THREAD, THAT YOU,
YES YOU, HAD ?????????
O, I REMEMBER NOW,
YOU STARTED AFTER MONTHS AND MONTHS
TO ADD THE FOLLOWING,
"Just my opinion."
AT THE END OF YOUR POSTS.
ok, enough
sorry Digrdug,
just my frustration that your zillion posts every day every week
ever month i read that thread were the same same same
"GE is a complete scam... " WITHOUT your "I have no proof."
as you repeated over and over the same message to anyone
who read that thread for the first time to quickly leave before
you get sucked in and lose all your investment etc etc.

dougak



To: Digrdug who wrote (583)4/15/2002 5:42:24 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1003
 
Hate to be this blunt-sounding, but I can only give you the honest answer.

And that answer is: Don't know. Don't care.

I consider Jeff a good friend and even if I didn't, I wouldn't speak against him or facilitate making his job tougher.

In my time working with Jeff, I never had occasion to disagree with him.

BTW: I understand you worked for SI. really cracked me up. :)



To: Digrdug who wrote (583)4/15/2002 6:14:22 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 1003
 
'...Jeff seems to be unable to take the time to follow the sequence of events and only reacts to the people that file TOU complaints against me when I react to them attacking me. '

Wrong tack here, paisano ... while that sort of thing does happen at times [Bob!-g-], the onus is on you to keep free of any contraventions of a breach of the peace, as Long John Baldry would say ... this may seem unfair, probably is when a bunch gangs up on you, doesn't matter - admin's job is to regulate discussion, you just have to work within that as a parameter .... and it's not that difficult, if you think carefully, calm yourself before posting ... Nietzsche once said 'all thought worthy of the name comes while walking', or something like that ... mind you, he really was a whacko, wasn't he

Feel free to tell Jeff i never thought much of that mine/myng promotion either, if you think it might help ... it's got desert dirt overtones to it imho, sounds too good to be true, doesn't have a canehjun listing, you don't see credible independent oldtimer resource players talking it up, etc ...... but when it comes to discussion, that's between you and Jeff, you just have to accept being held to a standard higher than that which will be applied to the stock's proponents