Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (163890)	4/16/2002 2:11:56 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Just by reading the posts here, it doesn't matter what gutman says, it is what SIII says. Gutman can't testify. If i get a chance I will read the transcript to find out what really went into evidence. d. Howard Gutman, an attorney for the states, told U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly that Sanders asked Microsoft to announce support for its chip technology, codenamed Hammer, ahead of a competing product just being developed at Intel Corp

To: fingolfen who wrote (163890)	4/16/2002 2:12:10 PM
From: tcmay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

"Ouch... do the words quid pro quo ring a bell? I don't think Jerry just did AMD a favor. " Precisely the same words I used in a post a short while ago over on the Mind Control AMD thread: (Note: although I mistakenly assumed the quid pro quo might involve MS dropping work on IA-64 products. As others noted, Jerry probably wants MS to downgrade work on Yamhill, the Intel x86-64 version. So ignore the IA-64 reference below and replace it with "Yamhill.") Message 17337647 "Jerry's quid pro quo: Drop IA-64, support Hammer, and I'll say in court you told me the whole court thing is "crazy."" --Tim May