Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (163945)	4/16/2002 6:01:43 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

So Windy what are your objections to Mr Saunders comments. Enough of your prattling regarding his not being an expert in reading legal documents. He is an industry expert and gave his opinion on the Balkanizing of MSFT code in a very cogent manner. JFD

To: Windsock who wrote (163945)	4/17/2002 2:28:03 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Any testifying expert will review materials on the subject before they testify. And every time the expert testifies, the opposing attorney will ask about the materials that were reviewed. This has happened throughout Uh, not exactly. Sanders can and did testify as to matters which he knows first hand, and may testify as an expert as to those things, such as the results of any court drafted software. He is not testifying as a legal expert. He is not testifying as to the efficacy of the terms that the states have concocted. He is testifying only to the questions asked of him. But don't feel badly, you have good company, apparently the states' attorney didn't understand that, either.