Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (160463)	4/17/2002 11:03:58 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

The hilarious thing about the MOT number is that "they" are running up all kinds of wireless dreck on the back of it. UFB!

To: Earlie who wrote (160463)	4/17/2002 11:09:38 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Earlie, Even Dan Niles did his homework this time, as surprising as that may be. <g> So, what did you think of Gretchen winning the Pulitzer? I thought it was great and she didn't even have to invent a 5 year old heroin addict like the reporter in Philadelphia a couple of decades ago. I haven't looked at MOT. In my trading life, I have had zero luck with that stock, long or short. I did have some great fortune with an INTC/Mot paired trade for years. But paired trades are easier and I still have no confidence in my ability to trade the turkey. I've just decided to avoid it. <g