Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (9495)	4/17/2002 5:41:27 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Jerusalem may have an equal significance for Christians. It does not have an equal significance for Muslims, unless Mecca and Medinah are not more important sites. Nor does it have especial significance for Arabs, as such, whereas it was not only the religious but national center for the Jews until the destruction of the Temple. Additionally, the sites have been fairly administered, not only Christian and Jewish, but Muslim. I would say, in fact, that Muslim control of the Dome of the Rock, for example, would be within the scope of negotiations. But not internationalization. That is not at all likely to be on the table.......