SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (249056)4/18/2002 1:10:10 PM
From: Cal Gary  Respond to of 769667
 
Errant U.S. Bomb Kills Canada Troops


E-Mail This Article

Printer-Friendly Version

Subscribe to The Post





By Ken Guggenheim
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, April 18, 2002; 12:33 PM

WASHINGTON –– The pilot of an American F-16 bombed Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan believing they were enemy forces firing on him, defense officials said Thursday. Four Canadians were killed and eight wounded.

The soldiers were the first Canadians killed in a combat zone since serving alongside Americans in the Vietnam War. Their unit, the 3rd Battalion of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, based near Edmonton, Alberta, was the first all-Canadian unit to suffer fatalities in a half-century.

Without getting permission, the U.S. Air National Guard fighter dropped a 500-pound laser-guided bomb on troops participating in a nighttime live-fire training exercise near the southern Afghanistan city of Kandahar.

The jet, flying in tandem with another American F-16, had been sent out on patrol. It was unclear whether they had been given any other mission.

It appeared the pilots did not know they were flying over an area restricted for training – and so fire from the training exercise made them believe they were under attack, officials at the Pentagon said.

One sought permission to bomb and was given the go-ahead only to mark the target, a senior Pentagon official said. On a second fly-around, again thinking he was under fire, he dropped the bomb in what he thought was a self-defense move, the officials said.

Canadian Defense Minister Art Eggleton, who called the deaths shocking, said Thursday that one of the injured had life-threatening wounds and the other seven were in stable condition.

In a brief written statement, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld expressed regret over the accident and said he had assured Eggleton that Gen. Tommy Franks, the U.S. war commander, would work closely with Canadian representatives at Franks' Tampa, Fla., headquarters to investigate the cause.

U.S. and Canadian officials said the accident occurred at 1:55 a.m. local time Thursday (5:25 p.m. EDT Wednesday) about 10 miles south of Kandahar, a former Taliban stronghold. The two countries plan a joint investigation.

"As to the circumstances of what appears to have been a terrible accident, clearly there are many questions that the families, and all Canadians, expect to have answered," Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien said in a statement.

After daylight in Kandahar, clusters of Canadian soldiers gathered at a bulletin board to read a posted statement about the deaths and injuries. Around the base, troops talked quietly in small groups.

Chretien said President Bush had called to offer his condolences.

Canada's defense chief, Lt. Gen. Ray Henault, told reporters in Ottawa that the area was recognized as a training area and the aircraft were using very strictly controlled routes.

"How this can happen is a mystery to us. Without a doubt, there was a misidentification," Henault said.

At the coalition base in Kandahar, U.S. Army Col. Frank Wiercinski called the Canadians an integral part of the coalition's operations in Afghanistan.

"They are our comrades-in-arms," Wiercinski said standing in front of a Canadian flag at half staff. "In the last several months, we have lived together, we have fought together and now we will mourn together."

Canadian Army Lt. Col. Pat Stogran, the battalion commander, pledged to friends and families that the wounded would receive the "best possible support," and that the battle group would remain steadfast.

"These young men were among the finest, bravest paratroops I have ever soldiered with," Stogran said. "They will not be forgotten."

Officials said the site of the accident was a former al-Qaida training camp now used daily by coalition forces for live-fire exercises.

Canadian forces are fighting alongside U.S. and European troops seeking to hunt down remnants of Osama bin Laden's terrorist organization and holdouts from Afghanistan's former ruling Taliban militia.

At the Bagram air base in Afghanistan, Maj. Bryan Hilferty, a U.S. military spokesman, offered his condolences to the victims.

"We do everything we can to mitigate risk," he said. "We try to make sure we have all sorts of procedures, tactics and techniques in place to mitigate risk. But unfortunately, it's an inherently dangerous business."

The bombing is among the worst friendly fire accidents since the U.S.-led campaign in Afghanistan began in October.

On Dec. 5, a B-52 dropped a bomb on U.S. and Afghan forces near Kandahar, killing three Americans and at least seven Afghans, and slightly wounding Hamid Karzai, now Afghanistan's interim leader. The investigation isn't complete, but officials have said there were errors in transmitting target coordinates to the B-52.

On Dec. 22, U.S. aircraft struck a convoy near Khost, killing dozens of Afghans. Some Afghans say the convoy was carrying tribal leaders to Karzai's inauguration, but U.S. military commanders insist it was a legitimate target.

A training accident in the Kuwaiti desert on March 12, 2001, killed five American soldiers and one New Zealand officer; a Navy F/A-18 pilot was mistakenly given the signal to bomb an observation post. Three Americans were injured.

–––

Associated Press writer Rob Gillies in Toronto contributed to this report.

© 2002 The Associated Press



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (249056)4/18/2002 1:21:36 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "Time for a new five-year plan?"

Sometimes these 5- and 10-year plans actually work, George, e.g., the man-on-the-moon rocket launch in '69.

Why not similar for alternative energy?

But both you and I know this likely won't happen because of the influence that GM, Exxon et al. have on Washington.