SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (145481)4/19/2002 10:30:05 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574216
 
It would we ( the population of earth) would have even more time with cheap oil, even more time to develop alternatives, which would mean that when this resource starts to run out, and the price skyrockets, there would be viable alternatives in place to replace the expensive oil

The thing that creates viable alternatives is skyrocketing prices. If oil prices do not move upward, there is simply no incentive to make the capital investment to develop alternatives.

The reason fuel cells and other newer technologies are going to take so long to develop is that they aren't economically feasible at this time. If you were having to pay $10/gal at the pump, there would be an immense, successful drive to have fuel cell technology up and running in a very short period of time. But with gas at the pump $1.50/gal, there simply isn't any reason to do so.

You want to see alternatives developed? Let the price of fuel do what it wants to do -- go up. But I don't want to see that happen at the expense of our national security.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (145481)4/19/2002 12:26:05 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574216
 
Advanced Micro's Founder Departs
on a Losing Note

By CHRIS GAITHER

SAN FRANCISCO
ESTERDAY, W. J. Sanders
III released his 119th, and last,
earnings report as chief executive
of Advanced Micro Devices, the
chip maker he founded 33 years
ago. He ended his reign as he,
like most entrepreneurs, began:
losing money.

The loss was narrower than Wall
Street analysts had expected.

The flamboyant salesmanship Mr.
Sanders has exhibited since he
started the company in 1969 has
become a trademark of Advanced
Micro, especially in the
longstanding feud with its larger
rival, Intel.

Over the years, Mr. Sanders has
competed with, insulted and
occasionally sued Intel, which
sells the chips at the heart of 8 of
every 10 personal computers.
People in the industry say the
fierce competition has pushed
Intel and wrung better products
and lower prices out of the entire
semiconductor industry.

But at the age of 65, Mr. Sanders
is finally loosening his grip on Advanced Micro. Next
week, he will hand control of daily operations to his
handpicked successor, Hector de J. Ruiz, the president
and chief operating officer.

Mr. Ruiz, who was hired away from Motorola in January
2000 as the heir apparent to Mr. Sanders, will assume the
title of chief executive at a gathering for Wall Street
analysts in New York on April 25. Mr. Sanders will
remain chairman until 2003, when he expects to step
down.

Advanced Micro reported a net loss of $9.2 million, or 3
cents a share, for its first quarter, ended March 31.
Analysts had forecast a loss of 6 cents a share, according
to a survey by Thomson Financial/First Call. During the
period last year, the company had a profit of $124.8
million, or 37 cents.

Sales were $902 million, down sharply from a year
earlier, when Advanced Micro reported revenue of $1.2
billion. Mr. Sanders said the company had maintained its
market share in PC chips; he called that an achievement,
given that Dell Computer, which sells only Intel-based
systems, was the only computer maker to grow last
quarter.

In comments accompanying the earnings report, Advanced
Micro, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., indicated that the
semiconductor industry had continued to return to normal
seasonal patterns after the worst year in its history, though
no major recovery was seen. Intel reported similar
observations but stronger financial results on Tuesday,
when it announced a profit of $936 million.

For the current quarter, Advanced Micro said it expected
to sell 5 percent to 10 percent fewer PC chips and to
report sales of $830 million to $900 million. Mr. Sanders
backed off from earlier promises that the company would
turn a profit again during the quarter, though he said that
might happen.

"If we make the $900 million end of the range, we make
money," he said.

In regular trading, shares in Advanced Micro rose 47
cents, to $14.82. Intel's positive earnings report from the
evening before led technology issues upward. Its shares
gained $1.13, to $30.64.

Advanced Micro was once a back-up supplier for Intel's
contracts with computer makers, but by the late 1980's,
Mr. Sanders had turned it into a ferocious competitor.

"He's been able to stay two or three chess moves ahead of
anybody else in the market," said Joe David Jones, a
former Advanced Micro executive who founded
BridgePoint Technical Manufacturing, which tests chips.

With its Athlon chip for desktop PC's, Advanced Micro
built a following among computer enthusiasts, who like
the Athlon for its speed at playing computer games and
rendering graphics. But the company is still struggling to
win support in the corporate market. It hopes to change
that with a new line of chips, called the Hammer family,
expected late this year. Hammer chips use a technology
that allows them to run both 32-bit and 64-bit computer
programs, a claim Intel has not yet matched.

"The Pentium killer," as Mr. Sanders described Hammer
yesterday, is expected to run desktop, notebook and
powerful data-serving computers.

Many analysts say Advanced Micro's introduction of the
Athlon is a nearly flawless execution of its strategy to
identify and exploit Intel's weaknesses. The analysts said
Hammer holds even greater promise, but said the company
must maintain its focus on execution under Mr. Ruiz as
Hammer arrives in the market.

Outwardly, the two men are different in striking ways. Mr.
Sanders is the consummate salesman, known for his
exquisitely tailored suits, Rolls-Royces and meticulous
grooming. After years of practice, anti-Intel comments roll
easily off his tongue. Mr. Ruiz is praised as more of a
technical and operations expert, the ego to Mr. Sanders's
id.

But a spokesman for Advanced Micro, who said the
transition had been carefully planned, noted that the men
shared a similar vision. He said they would continue for
another year to divide responsibilities in much the same
way as they have.

Though Mr. Sanders's title may change, executives who
know him well said that Mr. Sanders, who is known as
Jerry, was unlikely to fade away quickly.

"His involvement will decline slowly over time as both
A.M.D. and Jerry get used to him not being the C.E.O.,"
said Atiq Raza, a former heir apparent who left Advanced
Micro in July 1999 over differences with Mr. Sanders.
"He won't be completely giving away the reins. They will
slowly slip from his hands over time."

Yet there was a clear note of farewell as Mr. Sanders
concluded a conference call for analysts today by noting
that the previous three decades had been a pleasure.

"Next time I won't be the host, but I'll be listening in," he
said. "God bless."

nytimes.com



To: Joe NYC who wrote (145481)4/19/2002 12:26:40 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1574216
 
Daschle hunts for
political strategy

By Donald Lambro
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, the
Democratic Party's highest elected leader, is
having a hard time finding a campaign issue
with any political traction.
No matter what the
South Dakota lawmaker
has tried over the past
several months, nothing
seems to stick. President
Bush's polls continue to
hover in the high 70s or
low 80s. Republican
congressional polls show
that they still have a slight
generic lead over the
Democrats at this point in
the election cycle.
Democrats are complaining that their party's
base is becoming frustrated and fractured.
"He's a Democrat in search of a holy grail.
He's struggling to find what the political
weakness of this president is. He's searching
high and he's searching low and so far he's
come up empty-handed," said Marshall
Wittmann, a former adviser to Sen. John
McCain, Arizona Republican.
"There's immense frustration in Democratic
ranks. Their view is that if you take the war on
terrorism out of the picture, this should be
their moment," Mr. Wittman said.
It is not for lack of trying. Mr. Daschle,
who learned the art of political combat from
his Democratic mentor, former Senate
Majority Leader George Mitchell, has blocked
or delayed the administration's bills on trade,
energy, terrorism insurance and economic
stimulus.
Mr. Daschle blocked action on Mr. Bush's
stimulus package last month while criticizing
the president's tax cuts, which he said were
"making the economy worse." But the
economic numbers over the ensuing weeks
have improved. Jobs, manufacturing, housing
sales and overall economic growth are all up,
robbing Democrats of the biggest issue they
hoped to have in the fall.
Mr. Daschle has blamed the administration
for the disappearing surpluses and a projected
$100 billion deficit this year, charging that the
deficit would boost interest rates, weaken the
economy and rob Social Security of its trust
fund revenues.
But those issues do not seem to be working
either. Independent polls suggest that the
voters understand that the costs of the war and
homeland defense and the economic slump are
the big reasons for the surplus' decline. Voters,
often by sizeable margins, say they trust Mr.
Bush and the Republicans more than the
Democrats on the economy, national security,
fiscal responsibility and education.
Then Mr. Daschle tried to turn the Enron
collapse into a political scandal, hoping that
he could link Enron's campaign contributions
to Mr. Bush over the years into a quid pro quo
on energy policy. But thus far the
investigations and hearings have shown that
not only did the administration refuse to lift a
finger to save Enron, but that Enron also had a
deeper relationship with the Clinton
administration — which helped the energy
company finance a number of its overseas
business deals — and gave heavily to
Democratic lawmakers.
Now Mr. Daschle, in a move that some
strategists view as a high-risk strategy, is
questioning Mr. Bush's success in the war on
terrorism by saying that it "will have failed" if
Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda terrorist
leaders are not captured.
He made further criticisms on yesterday's
political talk shows, saying that Congress
should not approve money for a war on
terrorism that is broadening beyond
Afghanistan without consultation on the war's
scope and purpose.
Last week in an interview with South
Dakota's Sioux Falls Argus Leader
newspaper, Mr. Daschle suggested that the
country did not have enough money for
homeland defense because of "that crazy tax
cut."
His criticism of Mr. Bush on the war
surprised strategists who think it is born of his
inability to find any issue that worked for the
Democrats against the administration.
"To attack Bush at a time of war, when he
has this immense popularity, smacks of a kind
of desperation. You don't step on Superman's
cape, and that is exactly what Daschle is trying
to do," Mr. Wittmann said.
Growing malaise among the Democratic
Party's base, as well as Mr. Bush's inroads
into some of its key constituencies may explain
why Mr. Daschle has decided to make the war
a political issue, strategists said last week.
The cover story in the March issue of the
Washington Monthly asks, "Why Can't the
Democrats Get Tough?" The article calls on
Democrats "to remember how to fight like
Democrats."
"If they're serious about beating back Bush,
Democrats need to start pulling on all the
levers of power available to them, and to stop
shrinking away from sounding partisan when
the cause is just," the magazine said.
Mr. Daschle has said he may challenge Mr.
Bush for the presidency in 2004, and the
prospect has led to Republican criticisms that
his every action in the Senate is politically
motivated to enhance his future candidacy.
Mr. Daschle said that he will not make any
decision about running until after the 2002
elections, but he would have to give up his
Senate seat if he does. The state legislature
passed legislation that prevents him from
running simultaneously for president and the
Senate, and Republican Gov. William J.
Janklow signed the bill last week.

washtimes.com