Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145517)	4/19/2002 2:34:29 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575059

"but it's a heck of a lot more efficient than the internal combustion engine." By a large amount. The problem is that if you use a hydrocarbon fuel, you need to run it through a reformer to get the hydrogen. And they aren't small. And carrying pure hydrogen is not practical. Metal hydrides could be used, but they are tricky. Sodium borohydride is the most appealing method, it can be handled as a room temp. liquid, it won't burn, it's not explosive, it's reasonably non-toxic and can have an energy density close to gasoline. But you need the infrastructure in place...