SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (161146)4/20/2002 4:22:44 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
marginmike, >.If I hear one more Suzie Orhman say you need 1-2 moths salary put away for a rainy day

This is nuts!!!! Suzie Orhman has an IQ of less than zero. Back in the old days <g> we were advised to have at least a years worth of savings for a period of unemployment. Also to assume extra costs during the year like the purchase of a car or what ever else could go wrong. The old worst case analysis scheme.

I know during the last recession in 1990, 1991, and 1992 (whenever it was) some people were out of work for 3 years - so your thoughts of 2 to 3 years is reasonable. If this bubble bursting does its usual economic thing 3 years of savings could be a requirement. It would be fun to see the data on what capital this working generation really has to buffer an unemployment period.

We can use these old military bases we are closing down to house the unemployed.

Joan



To: marginmike who wrote (161146)4/20/2002 4:35:32 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<Frankly I think someone should have atleast 2-3 years saved away>>

Personally, I think 2-3 DECADES is ideal (but that's just me!<G>)