Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (77849)	4/22/2002 3:51:05 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

RE:"One thing puzzles me. If you print that much, why not use lazers. They have got to be cheaper overall, quieter and faster" I've been looking at Lasers. The ones that put out 4-5 ppm are around $1000-1500. That not the problem though. I'm doing a lot of full color brochures with pictures. Slows the Inkjets down to about 1 ppm. Well I thought maybe the lasers put out 4 ppm regardless of % of page/color etc. but apparently that slows them down to under 1 ppm as well. Or maybe that's for the first page. If I could get 4 ppm color on a laser vs 1 ppm on a inkjet I'd switch over. Jim