Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (26576)	4/22/2002 9:52:05 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

They are two different weapons with different mission capabilities. I know the difference, Hawk, but I would rather have one in an assault situation than the M16. However, at my age, the only thing I assault any more is the Dance Floor. (And I have been "Burning the Floor" lately :) However, I think my point that the M16, like most of what the grunt has, is outdated by new weapons. I think the OICW, at 10,000 to 12,000 a pop, is an abortion. (I can hear that non-com now, telling the troops how much his "rifle" costs, and how we can only afford one per squad, so pick it up when your buddy gets hit. :)) Lets let Unclewest tune in and tell us we are both wrong. This is a subject that has as many right answers as it does shooters to argue it. hkpro.com