Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (26635)	4/23/2002 4:48:36 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

Zubaydah: al Qaeda had 'dirty bomb' know-how From Jamie McIntyre CNN Washington Bureau April 22, 2002 Posted: 9:50 PM EDT (0150 GMT) WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The most senior al Qaeda leader in U.S. custody has told interrogators the terrorist organization was interested in producing a radiological weapon, or "dirty bomb," and knew how to do it, a U.S. official told CNN Monday. The admission is said to have come from Abu Zubaydah, who was captured and wounded in Pakistan April 1. But the official cautioned the United States remains highly skeptical of the credibility of Zubaydah, whom government officials said also was a source for an FBI warning issued Friday that al Qaeda members discussed plans for attacking banks and other financial institutions, particularly in the northeastern United States. And U.S. officials have repeatedly said publicly al Qaeda was believed to be seeking weapons of mass destruction, including chemical, biological and radiological weapons, but so far no evidence has been found they have succeeded. In March 19 testimony before Congress, CIA Director George Tenet said, "Terrorist groups worldwide have ready access to information on chemical, biological and even nuclear weapons through open sources. "Documents recovered from al Qaeda facilities in Afghanistan show bin Laden was pursuing a sophisticated biological weapons research program," Tenet said. "We also believe that bin Laden was seeking to acquire or develop a nuclear device. Al Qaeda may be pursuing a radioactive dispersal device, what some call a 'dirty bomb.'" U.S. officials said they were getting information from Zubaydah and checking it out. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Monday he did not know whether Zubaydah -- al Qaeda's head of operations and recruiting -- told the truth about the bank threats. "I have no idea if it was true or a lie or if he gave it. I'm not going to be reporting on what Abu Zubaydah does or doesn't do from day to day," he said. Friday's FBI warning was prompted "out of an abundance of caution," the bureau said. Rumsfeld did confirm that Zubaydah, who received three gunshot wounds when he was captured, has not been moved from the undisclosed location where he is being held. cnn.com

To: LindyBill who wrote (26635)	4/23/2002 5:52:50 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi LindyBill; Re heavy, bulky and hot. The elite military forces of the world have been outfitted with equipment with that description, with the addition of a few more adjectives like "expensive", "effective", and "difficult to learn to use" since Homer. I doubt it will change much in the future. But certainly soldiers are outfitted with gear nowadays that's less heavy, bulky and hot than what obtained in the Bronze Era. Bronze is relatively soft, so it took thick pieces to make effective armor. Soldiers traditionally didn't put it on until they were within sight of the enemy. It was so heavy that most of the members of an army were detailed to carry it around for the fighters who would put it on at the very last possible minute. The middle ages, with steel armor wasn't a hell of a lot better. They had to breed special horses to carry all that metal around. If a guy fell down, he couldn't get back up. And of course anyone who's picked up an unsporterized Springfield can attest to how much the weight the soldiers in WW1 carried around. -- Carl

To: LindyBill who wrote (26635)	4/23/2002 7:33:26 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 281500

I can guarantee you three things about this system. It will be 1) Heavy 2) Bulky 3) Hot and ........ 4) Expensive You should sit in one of the design meetings...preferably in a back row. You want to be close to the rest rooms when the urge to vomit comes. jttmab