Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (84703)	4/24/2002 4:23:46 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 116897

Subj: SI members violating the Terms of Use Date: 4/24/02 3:17:44 AM EST From: Dougakak To: si-techsupport@go2net.com Dear Silicon Investor, Please ask these two to stop their personal attacks towards me. These occur on the Gold Price Monitor thread where i post the latest information related to GATA, the Gold Anti-Trust Action organization, and also try and help this thread keep up to speed on developments gold related to fiat money creation, and issues at the core of which affect the value of money in all nations. These two persons both have what seems to be a personal problem with GATA and the Chairman of GATA, Bill Murphy, such that my support of GATA and Bill Murphy causes them constipation problems they direct at me as personal attacks. This Gold Price Monitor thread, in a self police'ing mode, seems to have accepted that 90% of posts are off-topic, plus 50% of posts are personal attacks dealing with Middle East policy differences, which i have accepted, with now the single most important fact affecting gold as Gold Price Monitor on topic material being GATA, these two wishing to ban it on this thread to fill a need to counter their dislike of GATA and Bill Murphy is quite wrong. two recent examples follow Note: lemessholecrappe (a.k.a. le ass hole crap) points to LeMetroPoleCafe.com which has articles of such on topic important to price of gold, and saddly missing from any posters on the thread that i give hints of article there in the hope that people will wake up and smell the coffee and make the thread worth reading so others will join, and hopefully change the off topic postings Message 17373616 To:Doug A K who wrote (84667) From: Bob Johnson Tuesday, Apr 23, 2002 11:56 PM ... and lemessholecrappe solicitations) on a specific topic ... although I do understand your inability to develop an independent thought and need to borrow from others. [end.] Message 17368667 To:Doug A K who wrote (84667) From: long-gone Tuesday, Apr 23, 2002 9:01 AM Don't you get it Doug? that we, by the way no longer want to read... [end.] Note: The above long-gone seems to speak for the thread quite often eventhought many have asked him to stop posting huge quantities of off topic full text of many pages of article rather than a simple introduction and url. Thanks, Doug AK

To: goldsheet who wrote (84703)	4/24/2002 6:17:34 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116897

Seen PDG's numbers yet? Blew "analysts" earnings estimates out of the water - high side - despite lower gold production.

To: goldsheet who wrote (84703)	4/24/2002 7:02:02 AM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116897

Here it is: "The company recorded a net profit of $43 million, or 13 cents a share, in the three months, compared with a net profit of $16 million, 5 cents per share, in the year-earlier period. Sales revenues were $303 million, down from $341 million in the corresponding period. Analysts were expecting earnings in the range of 6 to 11 cents a share with a consensus of 8 cents, according to Thomson Financial/First Call. Placer said it produced 660,000 ounces of gold in the quarter at a cash cost of $173 an ounce, compared with 694,000 ounces at a cash cost of $185 an ounce a year earlier. " biz.yahoo.com