Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lee who wrote (57444)	4/26/2002 4:51:52 PM
From: DebtBomb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Good post Steve. I agree with you. Anything goes now. They always have a plan. Uncharted water.

To: Steve Lee who wrote (57444)	4/26/2002 4:54:45 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

That's an intriguing theory, but if it's true, how come we had AJC on last Friday pumping the market, and GS this morning doing the same?

To: Steve Lee who wrote (57444)	4/26/2002 4:58:04 PM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 99280

good analysis, Steve. And one of the major dynamics of the general investing public is it's swinging from full gullibility to "trust no one". We are in that swing now, and it is surely not towards total gullibility:)Max

To: Steve Lee who wrote (57444)	4/26/2002 5:11:38 PM
From: DlphcOracl	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 99280

Steve: It is most instructive to review the posts on this message board and its predecessor (Steve's Channeling Thread) during the capitulation selloff in the last week of September. I did, and NO ONE saw that week as an intermediate or LT buying opportunity. It wasn't until one week later that Zeev and Larry Dudash thought it was a buying opportunity for more than a one day bounce. If I am wrong in this regard, a correction or clarification would be welcomed. I still think (hope) that we will get a significant bounce in May. If I am wrong, it becomes a LT investment with my error being 10-15% premature with regard to the bottom. I maintain: (1) we will not go below 1400 this year, and (2) the Nasdaq will once again cross 2000 in the next 12 months. If I am wrong on either count, I will be very surprised, and simply wait it out. Much easier than being on the wrong side of a short position.

To: Steve Lee who wrote (57444)	4/26/2002 5:32:03 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

I think that the last time we had 6 or 7 down days in a row, we had a solid DCB thereafter, the 7 days was, if memory serves into February 28 last year and we a got a very good bounce (about three days) and then about a month of further declines into the major low. (here it should take us into June). I agree that things are different, in regard to "analysts", but they are the same in regard to "da boyz", they will simply find "surrogate" pumpers, now that everyone is watching the tubes for their financials in lieu of SEC documents or analysts reports, the tube pumping will get into high gear... You can count on "da boyz" that they will not give up their advantage and step away from this lucrative business. If nothing else, they'll engineer a rally by spending very little on the futures before the open Monday. Zeev