Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Julian who wrote (11056)	4/27/2002 11:59:14 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Science is not perfect, but neither is anything else. Science is what you and I rely on and trust. I would not let a priest take out my appendix, and neither would you. I don't know what your specific point was as to the study in question. You didn't say. The U. of Geogia is a presdigious Research Center. The study was published in the "Journal of Abnormal Psychology". The subjects denied being aroused, but the measurements did not lie. That is what science is about...

To: Rick Julian who wrote (11056)	4/27/2002 4:10:43 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

using your "SCIENTIFIC study" as "proof"of a concept is very shaky evidence, IMO. Oh. Better turn off your computer then. Because it doesn't work, nor does the internet. They're both based on engineering, which is applied science and is obviously fallacious. You originally showed up spouting physics and Newton's 3rd Law to prove your "what goes around swings around to hit you in the butt" concept. You got pounded into the dirt on that one. So now you're back to tell us science doesn't work? As Solon suggested, when you have your heart attack, go see a New Age hippie. I'm sure they'll help.