Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (11062)	4/27/2002 1:07:28 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"[1] What control is there to ensure that the scores on the Index of homophobia are valid? Note that a moment later the author asserts that subjects lied. [2] What controls are there as to the lag in time between being shown a picture and sexual arousal? [3] What control is there to ensure that attaching the penis to a measuring device does not itself stimulate tumescence, in the absence of any pictures? [4] "80% and "one-third" above come to a grand total of 37 men ... presumably from Georgia. You want to go with that?" I don't have the time right now to hunt down all the details of that scientific study. In any case, it would take hours to read. Have you heard any respected sources questioning the scientific integrity of the study. They are a noted and highly respected research university. Have you heard of peer reviews which question the validity of the data? or are you just saying that maybe they made errors which have not yet been discovered by the scientific community, and that we need to wait a few more years to see if any informed criticism surfaces?