Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Amateur Traders Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (18980)	4/30/2002 7:48:20 AM
From: mish5000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19633

JB: Perhaps Sharck isn't replying to you because you are on ignore or something...just a thought... Anyways, with regards to OVER, anyone who knows my trading style, knows that I am a short seller 90% of the time. I was recommending a short at the $35 level for a retrace and partial gap fill. When I recommended taking out this position, Sharck agreed and gave a standard retrace target at around $32 if I remember correctly. So, to answer your question, OVER was never recommended as a Long at 35...some people were bellowing Long...but Sharck wasn't. Just a heads up

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (18980)	4/30/2002 12:30:45 PM
From: Sharck	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 19633

"...Attacking people when they're not around, yeah ... let's talk character some more..." You guys are falling for every set up I thro at you aren't you LOL? Putty in my hands... Joe, I ask you, what is the difference then, to attacking people, (which I certainly am not, never did, and never will) when they are away, and Tom's action of banning me from defending myself against attacks? So now you can add hypocricy to your self characterizations EH? LOL... For the record, I agree with Tony, as you will soon see, I hold Tom in the highest regard, and have done so for years. Time to run along now, I think this issue is settled. Peace out, Sharck "You posted the float on OVER in response to a question and your post sounded like the incessant spam for Da Room you are known for anymore .... " For crying out loud, I gave MONGO the float on OVER which he asked me for, a little exageration perhaps?